Lucida® Sans Unicode alternatives. Closest free font by our measurements: DejaVu Sans, score 89.

DejaVu Sans leads with score 89 against Lucida Sans Unicode, 8 points clear of Telex (81); Amiko is third at 79 of the 24 free fonts we measured.

Instead of Lucida Sans UnicodeScore

5 / 5

Score 89 · closest by measurements

DejaVu Sans

Lucida Sans Unicode
Lucida Sans Unicode
DejaVu Sans · free
DejaVu Sans

Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow

Loading font…

Lucida Sans Unicode

Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow
Lucida Sans Unicode 5.01, rendered from a licensed copy on October 1, 2026

Against Lucida Sans Unicode: x-height 3.1% taller, 2.4% wider, 4.1% lighter, and 12% less stroke contrast.

Letters that differ most from Lucida Sans Unicode: 8, 1, and 7.

Styles: 2 weights, with italics.

2 of the 24 reach 80 against Lucida Sans Unicode.

How the Lucida Sans Unicode comparisons are measured

Which Lucida Sans Unicode alternative to pick

Choose DejaVu Sans for Lucida Sans Unicode when score leads: it reaches 89 and runs 2.4% wider, with 2 weights and italics. Biryani gives Lucida Sans Unicode work 7 weights and ink 2.6% darker, while Telex is 4.9% narrower and 4.1% darker for a tighter setting.

Where DejaVu Sans and Lucida Sans Unicode differ

01 / Where the difference shows

8, 1, and 7: DejaVu Sans parts from Lucida Sans Unicode most here

DejaVu Sans keeps Lucida Sans Unicode’s width within 2.4%; the widest gap is 12% less stroke contrast.

The lab labels DejaVu Sans against Lucida Sans Unicode: x-height 3% taller.

humanist sans serif
Lucida Sans Unicode
817
DejaVu Sans
  • x-height+3.1%
  • Width+2.4%
  • Weight−4.1%
  • Contrast−12%

Every free font measured against Lucida Sans Unicode

Measured October 6, 2026, as shares of Lucida Sans Unicode’s own value
Free fontScorex-heightWidthWeightContrastLetters that differ
DejaVu Sans89+3.1%+2.4%−4.1%−12%8 1 7
Telex81−3.1%−4.9%+4.1%−8.4%C 1 5
Amiko79−1.6%+1.8%−4.9%−11%8 1 G
Biryani78+4.3%+2.2%+2.6%−19%8 l 6
Menbere77+7.5%−0.3%+9%−13%I t q
Prompt77−9.5%+0.4%+13%−9.2%8 o b
Amulya77−5.1%−4.8%−11%−9.7%g y l
Tauri76+4.5%−4.2%+23%−6.8%8 g j
Sansation73−3.3%−6.5%+0.6%−13%8 t 6
Noto Sans73+1.1%−3.6%−2.4%−13%I t q
Kanit73−11%−5.5%+20%−16%8 Q l
Lunasima73−1.3%0%−6.5%−12%I q t
Kufam72+2.6%−0.9%+0.3%−17%V A W
Inder72−5%−5%+5.6%−4.6%8 q t
Federo72−13%−18%+8.6%+63%s 7 U
Noto Sans Display72+1.1%−8.9%+0.4%−14%I c t
Doppio One72−2.9%−3.1%+27%−12%8 9 b
Open Sans72+0.9%−5%−7.6%−13%g t q
Roboto71−0.4%−9.2%+10%−14%8 C G
Voces71−2.7%−4.6%+4.1%+10%8 G t
Encode Sans Semi Expanded71+2.3%−2.7%−9.4%−11%j B 8
Zamero Sans71−5.5%−3%+20%−21%8 l J
Allerta71+3.9%+6.2%+11%−3.7%0 C l
Encode Sans Expanded71+2.3%+3.8%−12%−13%B j 8

Can I use these Lucida Sans Unicode alternatives for…

Lucida Sans Unicode: licence verdicts
Free fontWebAppLogoPrintSellingCommercial
DejaVu Sans!*!*✓✓✓✓
Telex✓!*✓✓✓✓
Amiko✓!*✓✓✓✓

Lucida Sans Unicode alternatives: questions

What is the closest free alternative to Lucida Sans Unicode?

DejaVu Sans scores 89 against Lucida Sans Unicode, ahead of Telex (81) and Amiko (79) among 24 free fonts.

Which Lucida Sans Unicode alternative is closest in size?

Menbere matches Lucida Sans Unicode’s width most closely (0.3% narrower), and Amiko its x-height (x-height 1.6% shorter), of these 5.

How does Telex differ from Lucida Sans Unicode?

Telex scores 81 against Lucida Sans Unicode: x-height 3.1% shorter, 4.9% narrower, 4.1% heavier, and 8.4% less stroke contrast. Its C, 1, and 5 differ most from Lucida Sans Unicode’s.

Which Lucida Sans Unicode alternative has the most weights?

Biryani has the most of the Lucida Sans Unicode picks here, 7 weights; Menbere has 7 weights, Amiko has 3 weights, and DejaVu Sans has 2 weights.

Can I use the Lucida Sans Unicode alternatives commercially?

Yes, all 5 free alternatives to Lucida Sans Unicode here allow commercial work.

Is Lucida Sans Unicode an open font?

No. Lucida Sans Unicode ships with Windows 11 and Microsoft 365.

Paid fonts that share free alternatives with Lucida Sans Unicode

About Lucida Sans Unicode

Charles Bigelow and Kris Holmes designed Lucida Sans Unicode for Bigelow & Holmes in 1993, a humanist sans serif.

Besides Lucida Sans Unicode, Charles Bigelow and Kris Holmes designed Lucida Console.

Lucida Sans Unicode carries the Lucida® trademark of Bigelow & Holmes; FontForThat is not affiliated with Bigelow & Holmes; this is an independent comparison.